News

The Canwest series, headlined New Energy Future, was entitled "a special information feature, in partnership with Shell Canada." That phrase is in print three millimetres high. The pieces were published in the National Post, the Montreal Gazette, the Ottawa Citizen, the Edmonton Journal, the Calgary Herald, Toronto Star and the Vancouver Sun.

The stories describe Shell's environmental work and profile Shell employees. "Myth Buster" sidebars portray Shell's oilsands operations positively.

"They should be marked clearly that they are advertising," Sierra Club director John Bennett said Thursday. "They appear to be newspaper stories."

"The normal standards that would apply would be to identify it clearly as advertising rather than as editorial content," says Chris Waddell, director of the Carleton University School of Journalism. "But you can see over the years, both in newspapers and magazines, an attempt being made to make the differences look as insignificant as possible."

NAIC states climate change will have impacts on insurance companies including company financial health and availability and affordability of insurance for consumers. Insurance companies with premiums of $500 million or more a year are now required to complete an Insurer Climate Risk Disclosure Survey every year with a first deadline of May 1, 2010. Scope of the new disclosure is broad, covering altering risk management to catastrophe risk modeling and steps taken to educate policymakers and policyholders.

Recently, the NAIC Climate Change and Global Warming Task Force released a draft notification letter to insurers with instructions how to respond to the regulators climate risk disclosure survey. An extensive report, Global Risks 2010, outlining climate changed risks has been released by NAIC

The EPI has been created by experts from Yale and Colombia Universities to look at ten environmental categories for each nation including: environmental health, air quality, water resource management, biodiversity and habitat, forestry, fisheries, agriculture, and climate change.

The United States scored as 61st on the list, plunging twenty-two places from 2008, largely due to failure to deal with greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution problems. Canada also took a big plunge, falling from 12th place to 46th. Canada has come under increasing criticism for its stagnant climate change policies and its tar sands industry.

"These are prime opportunities for Canada to shine on the world stage during the International Year of Biodiversity and in the lead-up to the G8 and G20 Summits," states Barry Turner, Chair of Green Budget Coalition, and Director of Government Relations, Ducks Unlimited Canada.

1. Fund national ecosystem based adaptation strategy to improve Canada's biodiversity protection on lands and oceans.
2. Deliver Canada's promised federal water strategy by investing in water and wastewater infrastructure, cleanup of contaminated sediment, and protecting freshwater ecosystems in the Great Lakes - St. Lawrence Basin.
3. Create at least 8,000 jobs by renewing incentives for renewable power, establishing green energy bonds and mapping Canada's geothermal potential.

"Mining, oil and gas development and coalbed gas extraction will not be permitted in British Columbia's Flathead Valley," announced Lieutenant Governor Steven Point by during the Speech from the throne February 10th, 2010.

"We applaud the government for doing the right thing for the Flathead River Valley." states John Bergenske, executive director of Wildsight. "The next step is to connect the Flathead through the spine of the Rockies as a provincial wildlife management area so that wildlife values are adequately managed."

Conservation groups urge these further steps as critical to the integrity of the Flathead/Crown of the Continent ecosystem. This ecosystem contains British Columbia's most endangered river, the world's first international peace park, and a biological richness that scientists around the world identify as needing protection.

In January, a team of UN scientists recommended a moratorium on mining in the valley, noting nearby Glacier National Park in Montana and Waterton International Park in Canada were listed as a World Heritage Site in 1995 because of their outstanding scenery and abundant wildlife.

In 2010 Earth Hour is at 8:30 PM March 27, 2010.

Political leaders around the world have not yet negotiated a global deal on climate change. The United Nations Climate Change Summit in Copenhagen last December fell far short of what's needed. Earth Hour 2010 is critical to tell world leaders to finish the job by quickly completing a fair, ambitious and binding deal to avert dangerous climate change.

Started in 2007 in Sydney Australia, people in 88 countries and 4100 cities participated in 2009. WWF International sponsored 2008, 2009, and is leading Earth Hour 2010. Last year ten million Canadians turned off the lights.

Canada will be in the spotlight this year as Prime Minister Harper hosts the next meeting of the G20 countries in Canada June, 2010, where the climate talks must continue.

The Canada Peoples Submission will be considered by the UN with submissions from other countries with their emissions targets for 2020. It suggests Canada should take stronger action by reducing emissions 25% below 1990 levels by 2020 (a resolution already passed by the Canadian parliament).

The Peoples Submission is accompanied by signatures of 150,000 Canadians who signed the KyotoPlus petition.

In the letter, Tindal urges Canadians "to choose hope and action over despair and paralysis" in addressing what she calls "one of the most urgent moral challenges in human history."

"I believe this is a unique time in humanity's fretful reign on Earth, a rare moment that will have historic significance," writes Tindal.

"We need each other. We are emphatically, biologically not alone. As the carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere rise, the planet will fail to provide for us. Life as we know it will die. Millions of human lives are on the line, rich and poor, old emitters and new, vulnerable and strong. There is no inoculation against this except all of us changing our behaviour all at once."

The SEC as a regulatory body requires public US companies to disclose information for investors, especially on topics that are of interest to the business and investment communities. The goal of this new disclosure requirement will be to guide companies to disclose the "impact that business or legal developments related to climate change may have on its business".

This disclosure interpretive release comes following pressure from government, investors and environmental organizations for the SEC to clarify and strengthen requirements for reliable information about the impacts of climate change on public companies.

• Impacts of legislation and regulation relating to climate change
• Effect of international treaties and accords
• Effects from physical impacts of climate change
• Consequences of climate change on regulatory and business tends

Former customers for the newsprint from this mill included newspapers in the US and Canada. An earlier plan to combine a new sawmill with the TMP mill was dropped.

Despite the situation described above in late 2009 Manitoba Conservation requested a twenty year forest stewardship plan, with a proposal under Manitoba's Environment Act, and environmental impact assessment. The filings went to public review, which closed in January 2010. The licence for the mill, and the woodlands operation are separate licences, but both are held (together with a legal agreement with the Manitoba government) by the same company. All fiber under a woodlands environmental licence goes through the mill. Tembec had been securing additional fiber for the mill across the province.

Manitoba Wildlands responded to the public review under the Environment Act.

"We found there was a lack of context, and a serious lack of knowledge of public policy as these apply to the public forests in the Forest Management Area. The lack of a business plan, or explanation whether there is any market or an operating mill for the fiber is a glaring deficiency at this time. Our recommendation to the minister of Conservation is to avoid licencing until there are answers to these deficiencies, an improved plan, and EIA," commented Gaile Whelan Enns, director of Manitoba Wildlands.

The bottled water industry is a commercial giant that is coming under increased scrutiny regarding: safety of bottled water, weak bottled water regulatory and control standards, growing control of water, and the heavy social and ecological impacts from the bottled water industry. Producing bottled water consumes more energy, releases more harmful toxins into the environment, and is less regulated than municipal water systems.

To date 70 municipalities, 6 school boards and 3 campuses in Canada have banned provision and sale of bottled water. To participate in getting bottled water phased out of your community, organizations, businesses, schools and campuses can sign the pledge for Bottle Free Day, set up bottle free zones, and contact government leaders.

"The grain grown to produce fuel in the US [in 2009] was enough to feed 330 million people for one year at average world consumption levels," states Lester Brown, director of the Earth Policy Institute.

The number of hungry people in the world has increased to over 1 billion people, according to the UN World Food programme.

"Continuing to divert more food to fuel, as is now mandated by the US federal government in its renewable fuel standard, will likely reinforce the disturbing rise in world hunger. By subsidising ethanol production to the tune of $6bn each year, US taxpayers are subsidising rising food bills at home and around the world," states Brown.

More than 80 new US ethanol plants have been built since 2007, with more expected by 2015. when the US will need to produce an additional 5bn gallons of ethanol to meet its renewable fuel standard.