Manitoba Wildlands  
Court Upholds Need for Environmental Assessment 28 January 10

mineThe Supreme Court of Canada has ruled the Canadian government violated Canada's environmental law. In a case centered on the proposed British Columbia Red Chris, the Court ruled the federal government cannot split projects into artificially small parts to avoid rigorous environmental assessment. The ruling also guarantees the public will be consulted about major industrial projects, including large metal mines and tar sands developments.

"The Supreme Court has given Canadians back their voice and, with it, their ability to influence major industrial development across the country," said Ecojustice lawyer Lara Tessaro, who represented MiningWatch Canada. "This landmark decision confirms that the government can no longer shirk the environmental protection duties that Parliament has assigned to it."

The proposed open-pit mine would be located adjacent to an area called the Sacred Headwaters, the birthplace of the Stikine, Nass and Skeena Rivers. If built, it would endanger wildlife, destroy three trout-bearing streams and risk toxic contamination of two watersheds. The proposed mining project would wipe out pristine Black Lake by converting it into a "tailings impoundment area" - a dumpsite for toxic mine waste.

"These are serious issues where the public needs to be able to have a say. That's what we thought the law said, and now the Court has backed us up," said Jamie Kneen of MiningWatch Canada.

View January 21, 2010 Supreme Court of Canada Judgement
View January 21, 2010 Nation Talk article
View January 21, 2010 CBC News article
View January 21, 2010 MiningWatch Canada press release
View EcoJustice case study
View December 20, 2009 Indigenous Peoples Issues and Resources article

Source: Nationtalk.ca
  printer Print version Top


Manitoba Wildlands2002-2014