Manitoba Wildlands  
Minnesota PUC: Review Enbridge Oil Pipeline Expansion 27 September 13

Minnesota regulators have decided that Enbridge Energy's pipeline expansion plans need deeper study. More than 40 anti-pipeline activists sat quietly as the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) unanimously voted, to authorize a contested-case review -- similar to a trial -- of the need to expand the carrying capacity of the 1,000-mile "Alberta Clipper" pipeline.

Owned by Enbridge Energy Co. the line runs from Hardisty, Alberta, across northern Minnesota, and ends at an oil terminal in Superior, Wis.

"I am concerned about the potential for disaster," said Harry Miller, a retired Lutheran clergyman from Eagan who was among the activists who sought an extended review of the project. Pipeline opponents led by MN350 asked the commission to force Enbridge to prove before an administrative law judge that the expansion is needed and would be safe.

MN350, which says it's loosely affiliated with the climate change group, 350.org founded by environmentalist Bill McKibben questions the need for the expansion project, saying too much of the oil would be shipped out of state. McKibben and his group 350.org organize against TransCanada's proposed Keystone XL pipeline, which would import the same type of oil through western states.

View September 8, 2013 Indigenous Environmental Network article
View September 4, 2013 Minnesota Public Radio article
View September 6, 2013 PennEnergy article
View September 3, 2013 StarTribune article
Share printer Print version Top


Manitoba Wildlands2002-2014