A month long analysis of public comments on TransCanada's Keystone XL project linked more than half the pro-pipeline comments examined to people in the oil industry. As the U.S. State Department and President Obama, consider whether to approve the project, activists want industry linked remarks to carry less weight than those written by people without a vested interest in the outcome.
In a random sample of more than 1,000 comments in support of the Keystone, about 60 percent of the commenters' names were connected to oil and pipeline company employees, investors, lobbyists, attorneys and others working for the industry–all of whom could potentially benefit from the construction of the pipeline, the activists said. If built, the pipeline would carry diluted bitumen from Canada's tar sands region to the Texas Gulf Coast.
Building a pipeline that expedites and expands the world's dirtiest and most destructive oil mining project on the planet, puts landowners and precious natural resources at risk, and accelerates the release of dangerous climate-altering gasses is clearly not in the public's interest. It's in the interest of the oil industry, pure and simple.
View March 17, 2014 InsideClimate News article
View March 7, 2014 Huffington Post article
View January 31, 2014 Natural Resources Defense Council article
View Natural Resources Defense Council Stop Dirty Fuels:
Tar Sands page
|