Search our Site:
Energy Manitoba logo Climate Action Network Canada logo
 Sign up for
 Notices here

 
Manitoba Wildlands logo




News

Senate Holds Hearings on Pesticides, Bee Population 21 February 14

The heightened concern over crashing bee populations across Canada is witnessing the Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry holding hearings on the widely used, controversial neonicotinoid pesticides. Participants presenting evidence in the hearings will include beekeepers, grain-farmers and scientists.

Neonicotinoid pesticides, used throughout Canada's agricultural industry, have been positively linked to declining health and numbers in bee populations, and have been subject to increasing scrutiny as evidence piles up.

Corn and soybean crops are particularly linked to the use of neonicotinoids, with the pesticide spray accumulating on bees' bodies to degrade their immune systems.

The damaging effects of these pesticides far outweigh the benefits, with up to 40% of Canada's food crops highly dependent on a thriving and efficient bee population.

View February 5, 2014 Sierra Club Canada action alert page
View Senate Committees Directorate Notice of Meeting
View Rabble.ca articles on Neonicotinoids
View Proceedings of the Standing Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry
Source: Sierra Club Canada
Share printer Print version Top

Prosperity Mine Tests Canadian Environmental And Aboriginal Commitment 21 February 14

Tsilhqot'in Chiefs along with non-First Nations representatives from the Cariboo-Chilcotin region were in Ottawa to remind the Harper government the New Prosperity mine must be rejected after receiving a second negative Federal Panel Report. The Panel Report predicts that all the fish in Teztan Biny (Fish Lake) will die. The Federal cabinet is scheduled to make a decision by the end of the month.

"The Tsilhqot'in, supported by First Nations and non-First Nations across the country, fear the scathing findings of not one but two independent expert Panels will be forgotten amidst the lobbying efforts by Taseko Mines Ltd. and its supporters," said Chief Joe Alphonse, Tribal Chair for the Tsilhqot'in National Government.

Approval of the New Prosperity mine would send a damning signal to Canada's First Nations and the world that the Canadian government isn't serious about consulting and accommodating First Nations on major resource projects.

"First Nations across the province and the country are watching this decision very closely, as a test of the Harper government's commitment to First Nations or to maintaining the last shred of credibility left in the environmental assessment process," said Stewart Phillip of the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs.

View February 14, 2014 GlobalResearch article
View January 31, 2014 The Prince George Citizen article
View January 29, 2014 Sun News article
View January 17, 2014 The Vancouver Sun article
View November 20, 2013 The Vancouver Sun article
Share printer Print version Top

Judge: Keystone XL Not Allowed Through Nebraska 21 February 14

A judge has declared unconstitutional a Nebraska law used to reroute the Keystone XL pipeline.

Lancaster County District Judge Stephanie Stacy ruled Wednesday, February 19th, that the 2012 law improperly gave the governor authority to approve the pipeline route, said David Domina, an Omaha attorney who represented plaintiffs in the case.

Nebraska's most vocal pipeline opponents — along with several close watchers of the Canada-U.S. relationship — say the inevitable outcome of the new legal entanglement will be long delays, perhaps as much as another year, before the issue is settled one way or another.

"We don't see how the State Department possibly move forward when there is no certified route in Nebraska," said Jane Kleeb, director of Bold Nebraska, the state's largest anti-pipeline group.

Lancaster County District Judge Stephanie Stacy said regulatory control over pipeline companies rests with the Nebraska Public Service Commission. She granted a permanent injunction to prevent Gov. Dave Heineman and the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality from taking further action to advance the pipeline.

View February 21, 2014 CBC News article
View February 21, 2014 Financial Post article
View February 20, 2014 Toronto Star article
View February 19, 2014 InsideClimate News article
View February 19, 2014 JournalStar.com article
View February 19, 2014 ClimateProgress article
View February 24, 2014 InsideClimate News article
Share printer Print version Top

Trans-Pacific Partnership: Poison for Healthy Economy 21 February 14

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a new trade deal being negotiated in secret where only corporations get to contribute to, and look at the workings of the trade deal. The point of the Treaty: to double down on globalization precisely when the entire enterprise is beginning to fail as a result of stubbornly high oil prices, worsening climate change impacts (floods, droughts, wildfires), debt deflation, the middle-class fears of losing even more ground.

In January 2014, Wikileaks released a draft version of the 'Environment Chapter' from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), exposing most of the so-called "environmental protections" as toothless policies that serve to protect corporate profit not Mother Earth.

When compared against other TPP chapters, the Environment Chapter is noteworthy for its absence of mandated clauses or meaningful enforcement measures. The dispute settlement mechanisms it creates are cooperative instead of binding; there are no required penalties and no proposed criminal sanctions. With the exception of fisheries, trade in 'environmental' goods and the inclusion of other multilateral agreements, the Chapter appears to be a public relations exercise.

To date no debate in Canada's House of Commons, or Parliament Committees has occurred.

View January 15, 2014 WikiLeaks press release
View January 15, 2014 Common Dreams article
View January 15, 2014 Common Dreams article
View December 10, 2013 The Guardian article
View June 26, 2013 Huffington Post article
Share printer Print version Top

Hudson Bay Polar Bear Park Announced 14 February 14

The Manitoba government is well into its planning steps for a huge new protected area around Hudson Bay. The park would surround Wapusk National Park, cross the Nelson River, and extend to the Ontario border. The potential size of the park is up to two million hectares, though it is unknown what portion of those lands would be protected. Manitoba Hydro installations, a future generation station, and new converter station are within the suggested boundaries. Also the Churchill Rail Line, which is being touted to carry Bakken fields and other new oil sands products to Churchill for shipment by sea, is within the suggested boundary.

Several river fjords along the west wall of Hudson Bay above Churchill are candidate areas for protection from Manitoba's designers in Manitoba Conservation. These have also been signed off for protected status by Manitoba's minerals sector.

Manitoba Wildlands is providing maps to help understand the potential lands and waters involved.

"Public consultation, and meaningful steps with Aboriginal communities are required for decision making and designation of lands and waters. Protection standards in Manitoba are based on 20 years of regulatory language that is quite explicit. Zoning under the Parks Act can also occur, where lands are not protected. Manitoba Conservation will need to provide their scientific analysis, combined with traditional knowledge, as part of planning and consultation," commented Gaile Whelan Enns, director of Manitoba Wildlands.

View Proposed Hudson Bay Polar Bear Park maps
View Weetamah article written by Manitoba Wildlands director, Gaile Whelan Enns, about the Hudson Bay Polar Bear park
View Manitoba Wildlands Protected Areas/Parks Reviews page

Share printer Print version Top

Lord Stern: Be Fiercer On Climate Change 14 February 14

There are certain iron laws of recessions. One of them is that the urge to take care of the environment rapidly falls down the political agenda. The downturn of 2008-09 was a spectacularly big one so it is no surprise that those seeking an international agreement on climate change have found the going tough.

This is all a big mistake, according to Lord Stern, who completed a review of the economics of climate change for Tony Blair in what now seems the different world of 2006.

The record rainfall and storm surges that have brought flooding across the UK are a clear sign that we are already experiencing the impacts of climate change. There are powerful grounds for arguing that this is part of a trend.

Stern says things have moved on in the eight years since his review. "I would have been much fiercer", he says. "Emissions have gone up faster than I thought and some of the effects of global warming are coming through more quickly, such as melting of the glaciers and the polar ice caps. But technical change has been faster too."

Stern says that on present trends global temperatures will be 4-5C higher in the next century and governments are fooling themselves if they think this will only have a modest impact on their economies.

"The last time we had a change in global temperatures of this order of magnitude it was in the other direction. It was called the Ice Age."

View January 25, 2014 Reuters article
View January 24, 2014 Responding to Climate Change article
View January 23, 2014 The Guardian article
View January 22, 2014 The Weather Channel article
View January 22, 2014 The Globe and Mail article
View February 14, 2014 The Guardian article
Share printer Print version Top

Energy East Pipeline A Carbon Disaster Waiting To Happen 14 February 14

In August 2013, TransCanada announced its intention to build a $12-billion pipeline and export terminal project called Energy East. The proposed route would run from Hardisty, Alberta, to Saint John, New Brunswick. The pipeline could transport up to 1.1 million barrels per day of crude oil, from both oilsands and conventional production sources.

The Energy East pipeline, if built, would increase greenhouse gas emissions enough to wipe out all the gain from Ontario's elimination of coal-fired power plants, says a new report by the Pembina Institute. Author of the Pembina Institute report, Clare Demerse, said that conclusion demonstrates that regulators should consider the proposed pipeline's climate impacts in hearings on the project.

"We think that we need to think about the implications of pipelines, not just in terms of the implications along the route, but there's also a climate conversation to be had," Demerse said.

The report uses industry and government figures to argue that expansion of the industry is linked to expansion of the pipeline network that would bring its product to new markets. Climate Implications of the Proposed Energy East Pipeline provides a preliminary assessment of Energy East's impact on Canada's greenhouse gas emissions. It estimates the proposed pipeline's upstream impact as being between 30 and 32 million tonnes of annual emissions.

View February 6, 2014 CBC News article
View February 6, 2014 Pembina Institute blog post
View February 6, 2014 Pembina Institute report
View February 6, 2014 Reuters article
View January 27, 2014 Metro News article
View October 25, 2013 The Guardian article
Share printer Print version Top

Extreme Drought Measures in California 14 February 14

California is now taking desperate measures after its steady drought shows no signs of abating. A professor of earth and planetary sciences from Berkeley identifies this as potentially being the worst drought in 500 years, 17 rural communities in California are now facing the harrowing reality of potentially running out of drinking water in as little as 60 days. The main municipal water system, The State Water Project, has turned off its taps for the first time in its entire 54-year history, stating that it simply cannot provide enough water to supplement the agencies that provide water to 25 million people.

Extreme times call for extreme action, and state officials are now implementing emergency plans such as bringing water in by truck to rural communities, drilling new wells to tap into the groundwater supply, and enforcing obligatory water conservation methods on residents and businesses.

Widespread implications have arisen. These include the inability to grow crops or harbor livestock, a completely exhausted river system, salmon populations in danger of collapse, extreme risk of forest fires, diminishing health of state wildlife, and dangerously high levels of particulate matter, or smog, in the air around the Los Angeles basin.

The Sierra Nevada mountains, whose snow pack normally feeds the river systems of California, has only 12% of its usual snow pack.

View February 6, 2014 National Geographic article
View February 4, 2014 National Geographic article
View February 1, 2014 The New York Times article
View January 31, 2014 Aljazeera article
View January 5, 2014 The New York Times article
Source: The New York Times
Share printer Print version Top

Keeyask Hearings End with Some Surprise 10 January 14

Clean Environment Commission hearings for the Manitoba Hydro Keeyask Generation Station project ended Thursday, January 9, 2014, after 4 weeks of northern tour, and 8 weeks of Winnipeg hearings.

Participants in the proceedings and hearings provided closing statements through the week. Most advised the CEC Panel that they could not recommend a licence for the generation station. Reasons varied, but included gaps in method, gaps in data, and the need for the public utility to update its standards, share information, and be open to advice.

While the week progressed Manitoba Hydro decided to indicate that the Conawapa Generation Station project would be going to the Hydro board in March, and that the training program for Conawapa would upgrade those working on Keeyask also.

The utility also indicated their plan on how to conduct the Regional Cumulative Effects Assessment (RCEA) for the hydro region in northern Manitoba was with the minister, and they expected to finish the work in 2014. The assessment was recommended by the CEC, and endorsed by Minister Makintosh with direction to the utility after Bipole III. Participants' response to this timeline for the RCEA was consistent: The RCEA needs to be independent from the utility, with its cooperation, so as to avoid self assessment, and the same experts used for most Hydro projects.

To the surprise of the CEC and participants, Manitoba Hydro also indicated the general contract to build Keeyask has been awarded.

The CEC report regarding the Keeyask Generation Project has to be in the hands of the Minister within 120 days of the end of hearings.

View January 8, 2014 Manitoba Wildlands closing statements
View Manitoba Wildlands Keeyask Generation Project page
Share printer Print version Top

Species At Risk Act Lawsuit Forces Ministers To Act 10 January 14

Federal ministers responsible for protecting endangered species finally took action on four critically threatened species in the path of the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline. They were facing court action over their failure to meet their legal obligations according to the Species At Risk Act (SARA).

"The federal government's chronic delays in producing recovery strategies for Canada's endangered wildlife are forcing species already struggling to survive to wait even longer for the protection they desperately need," said Devon Page, Ecojustice executive director. "Worse, not having these recovery strategies in place makes it impossible for regulators to consider the full environmental impact of major projects like the Northern Gateway pipeline."

The lawsuit challenges the federal government's multi-year delays in producing recovery strategies for four species — the Pacific Humpback Whale, Nechako White Sturgeon, Marbled Murrelet and Southern Mountain Caribou. The habitat for all four species would be impacted by the construction and operation of the Northern Gateway pipeline, among other proposed developments.

Ecojustice lawyers are acting on behalf of five environmental groups in this lawsuit: David Suzuki Foundation, Greenpeace Canada, Sierra Club BC, Wilderness Committee and Wildsight.

View January 9, 2014 Huffington Post article
View January 8, 2014 Global News article
View January 2014 David Suzuki Foundation article
View November 7, 2012 Sierra Club B.C. information page
View July 13, 2006 Sierra Club Canada media release
Share printer Print version Top

Canadian Government Science Cutbacks Alarming 10 January 14

Scientists across the country are expressing growing alarm that federal cutbacks to research programs for monitoring areas that range from climate change and ocean habitats to public health will deprive Canadians of crucial information.

"What's important is the scale of the assault on knowledge, and on our ability to know about ourselves and to advance our understanding of our world," said James Turk, executive director of the Canadian Association of University Teachers.

In the past five years the federal government has dismissed more than 2,000 scientists, and numerous of programs and world-renowned research facilities have lost their funding. Programs that monitored things such as smoke stack emissions, food inspections, oil spills, water quality, and climate change have been drastically cut or shut down altogether.

Scientists went public with concerns that irreplaceable science could be lost when Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) libraries are closed.DFO plans to shut down seven of its 11 libraries by 2015. Already, stories have emerged about books and reports thrown into dumpsters and the general public being allowed to rummage through bookshelves.

"It makes no sense, financially or otherwise to close down libraries that hold millions if not hundreds of millions of dollars of research from studies over such a long period of time." said Kelly Whelan-Enns, researcher and policy analyst at Manitoba Wildlands. "What you have in effect is a muzzling of science and a profound restriction of anyone's ability to access the information. Information that supports action contrary to further development of the toxic bitumen tar sands projects may be most at risk."

View January 10, 2014 CBC News article
View January 8, 2014 The Tyee article
View January 7, 2014 The Globe and Mail article
View January 6, 2014 CBC News article
View April 14, 2013 Canada.com article
Share printer Print version Top

Canada's Emissions To Soar After 2020 10 January 14

The Canadian government has submitted two reports to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change that show Canada's emissions will spike sharply upward after 2020, driven largely by expansion of the oil sands.

The reports were submitted to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in late December with no announcement or press release. At the same time the reports were being filed, Prime Minister Stephen Harper indicated his government was delaying for two years long-promised regulations to reduce emissions from booming oil-sands projects.

In contrast, U.S. President Barack Obama laid out a plan last summer, including regulations on new and existing coal-fired power plants, that would largely meet the U.S. 2020 commitment, which is the same as Canada's.

Canada's emissions between 2020 and 2030 are predicted to climb by 81 million tonnes, taking Canada 11 per cent above 2005 levels – notwithstanding a new round of international climate negotiations aimed to find further global reductions from the 2005 base year.

View January 10, 2014 Pembina Institute blog post
View January 10, 2014 Toronto Star article
View January 8, 2014 The Globe and Mail article
View December 19, 2013 article
View October 2013 Environment Canada report
View Environment Canada Canada's Greenhouse Gas Emissions Projections page
Share printer Print version Top



Manitoba Wildlands2002-2014