Canada Federal Election Survey - 2006
This election survey has been sent to five political parties in Canada. (Election day is January 23, 2006.)
For details on public policy regarding Manitoba's lands and waters, previous election
environment commitments, policy and protected areas mapping, go to our
Governments page. Each question has been posed to the political parties based
on their campaign to form government in Canada. The survey requests either a Yes
or No answer to each question, with comments optional. Please Note: responses
from the political parties have not been altered in any way. When a party did
not answer a question with a definite Yes or No, " — " was entered.
NOTE - 3 parties have responded (Green Party, NDP and Liberals).
Q21 Will your government make use of emergency and safety net provisions of the Species At Risk Act to safeguard Manitoba's Woodland Caribou, given the Government of Manitoba has not listed the Woodlands Caribou under the Manitoba Endangered Species Act (MESA)?
|
YES |
NO |
Comment |
NDP |
— |
— |
The NDP continues to be critical of the inadequacies of the Species at
Risk Act, particularly the section that leaves the final determination of
species at risk to cabinet, instead of scientists.
In October 2004, we were highly critical of the Liberal Government’s
decision to not put BC's Sakinaw Lake sockeye and the Cultus Lake sockeye
on the species at risk list. As NDP MP and Environment critic Nathan Cullen
said at the time "This is the first time the Government has said 'no'
to a recommendation to protect a species. The entire act has only been in
force since June, and the Liberals have already set about weakening it. What
we are witnessing here today is conscious neglect and abdication of responsibility."
While the NDP is critical of the inadequacies of the Act, we support
using this Act and all of its provisions to ensure Canada does indeed protect
species at risk. |
Conservative |
|
|
|
Green Party |
|
|
|
Liberal |
— |
— |
21, 22, and 23. The Liberal government is committed to conserving Canada’s
wildlife and biodiversity. We believe protecting our natural heritage will
help lead to a healthier environment. The recommendation to add new species
to SARA is based on scientific assessments by the Committee on the Status
of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) and on consultations with governments,
landowners, conservationists, Aboriginal peoples, stakeholders and the
Canadian public. We are committed to ensuring the protection of species
at risk by developing:
- recovery strategies and action plans for threatened and endangered species;
and
- management plans for species of special concern.
In Budget 2003, the Liberal government announced $33 million in new spending
to implement the SARA. This amount will boost the existing spending that
has been in place since 2000 ($180 million over the 2000-2005). The process
that has lead to the new Species at Risk Act was initiated in 1996 when
the federal, provincial and territorial governments signed the National
Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk. The Committee on the Status
of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) meets at least once a year to
make updates to the status of different species. The SARA has adopted the
same guidelines for its process of following species recovery. Decisions
to add additional species to SARA are taken after serious consideration
of the information received from COSEWIC and consultations with the affected
provincial governments, First Nations, industry and others. |
Bloc |
|
|
|
Q22 Will your government make use of emergency and safety net provisions of the Species at Risk Act to safeguard species in Manitoba, for which COSEWIC may recommend emergency action and which the Government of Manitoba has not legally recognized as being at risk under MESA?
|
YES |
NO |
Comment |
NDP |
— |
— |
See #21 response |
Conservative |
|
|
|
Green Party |
|
|
|
Liberal |
— |
— |
See #21 response |
Bloc |
|
|
|
Q23 Will your government make sure that equivalent measures are put in place in Manitoba for all SARA-listed species and their habitat (woodland caribou, lake sturgeon, etc.), regardless of whether or not such species are listed under MESA?
|
YES |
NO |
Comment |
NDP |
— |
— |
See #21 response |
Conservative |
|
|
|
Green Party |
|
|
|
Liberal |
— |
— |
See #21 response |
Bloc |
|
|
|
|